Stacey Mason/Mark Bernstein
Kat Austen asks "What gives scientists—and writers—credibility?"
It’s intuitive, but being told it by a chap at Microsoft Research added the gravitas needed to move it from “common sense” to “information”. His position there gave him credibility.
It's obvious for scientists and researchers but writers? (I believe this attitude is antithetical to the spirit of science. Nobody cares where you’re from if you’re right. If your sums don’t add up, nobody cares that you have a job at Harvard. – MB) Austen means science writers, but is this true for novelist and eLit writers as well?
How important do you think institution is for credibility? Tweet replies to @HTLit hashtag #eLitCred